30 August 2006

C-802 (YJ-82) Anti-Ship Missile

The Hizbollah terrorist group has deployed shore-based C-802 Chinese anti-ship missiles supplied by Iran recently. It was pointed out to me by a reader that the missile is not a Silkworm/Styx derivative. It is a sea-skimming missile with active radar guidance in the Exocet class developed by the China HaiYing Electro-Mechanical Technology Academy. The development began in the seventies and early examples were available in the mid-eighties.

Quoting from the Sino Defence Website:

"The YJ-82 has only developed shore-to-ship variant launched from land-based vehicles. The missile received no order from the PLA. Following the 1991 Gulf War, Iran purchased about 60 land-launched C-802 missiles, which were deployed in coastal batteries on Qeshm Island."

From the Sino Defence page:

Specifications

Length: (YJ-8) 5.814m; (YJ-82) 6.392m
Diameter: 0.36m
Wingspan: (YJ-8) 1.18m; (YJ-82) 1.22m
Launch weight: 815kg
Warhead: 165 kg time-delayed semi-armour-piercing high-explosive
Propulsion: (YJ-8) One solid rocket engine, one solid booster; (YJ-82) One turbojet engine, one solid booster
Max speed: Mach 0.9
Max range: (YJ-8) 42km; (YJ-81) 80km; (YJ-82) 120km; YJ-83 (150~200km)
Flight Altitude: 20~30m (flight); 5~7m (attacking)
Guidance Mode: Inertial and terminal active radar
Single-Shot Hit Probability: 75%

The warhead is 165kg in weight and should suffice in disabling any destroyer, frigate, corvette of 4000 tons and under.

The warhead did fail to detonate upon hitting the Sa'ar 5 corvette.

There are several implications:

1. The Chinese has developed a sea-skirmming missile. It is no longer reliant on those 30-year old Styx derivatives (ie Silkworms).

And the possible implications:

1. There was an intelligence failure. The Phalanx CIWS and Barak anti-missile systems were not switched on.

2. There was a procedural failure or lapse. Systems not switched on or ready.

3. The Phalanx CIWS and Barak anti-missile systems were inadequate in keeping out a subsonic sea-skirmmer. Very possible.

4. The corvette (1000+ tons) is an inadequate radar and anti-air platform. FAC and missile corvettes are inherently unable to deal with air threats due to stability issues and more.

Point 4 is very real and many nations are hesistant when it comes to addressing that. The US Navy and Royal Navy have rejected the deployment of such craft despite a long history of testing for a variety of reasons which I will not be discussing.

2 comments:

Tim said...

This is a real problem. I wonder why the Chinese seem to be such good friends with the Iranians. Is it the oil? Or is it a way to undermine the supremacy of the USA without direct confrontation. Their lck of helpfulness in resolving the diplomatic immpasse with N. Korea seems also to fit this pattern. One wonders, what is their endgame?

Chuang Shyue Chou said...

Securing oil supplies, Tim. The Chinese obviously have their own self-interests at heart and their priorities and these may not necessarily coincide with American ones. The Chinese are indiscreetly involved with many projects with regards to oil with many nations. I think doing a search will reveal that.